June 11, 2009

Moodle! (topic of main focus)

Posted in Uncategorized at 1:21 pm by britta09

About Moodle (this link explains it really well with lego!):

“Moodle (noun) – acronym for Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment. An on-line learning management system (LMS), designed to create opportunities for rich interaction between teachers and learners.

to moodle (verb) – process of enjoyable tinkering that often leads to growing knowledge, insight and creativity. It applies both to the way moodle was developed, and to the way we may use it to teach and learn.”

  • it’s a on-line-learning  platform (free!) that allows teachers to create on-line courses by uploading material (e.g. reading assignments), create databases (also with the results of students’ tasks) and start or encourage discussions among the students concerning relevant topics. And, most importantly, it enables the teacher to observe what the students are doing e.g. how much time they spend on the platform.
  • students can find all the material relevant for the course without having to leave the house ;-) and are able to interactively communicate both with the teacher and the other learners. They can also open new discussion topics and share material e.g. by showing the others interesting links concerning the course.

The question of main interest in our course is, as always :

Is it helpful to use moodle in class?

As we experienced last week it is possible to have real ‘class’ without actually attending to class.  So if, for whatever reason, the teacher can not be with the students, moodle is an excellent way to teach anyway. Having worked with the moodle platform for some time now, I can only affirm that it is a great (and fun!) way of working: new material can be constantly looked up, any open questions can be discussed in the forum and it is definitely helpful to share your results and findings with other members of the course. So for a seminar like ours, that meets only once a week and has its focus on autonomous learning anyway,  moodle is an ideal method of enriching the ‘classroom’.

But in school the absence of a teacher without proper stand-in will be the case only exceptionally. And in normal proceedings all the things possible in moodle, like the supply of material and discussions  should actually be happening in class. To additionally use moodle would probably be unnecessary. Though one could argue that moodle is ideally fit for teaching languages, as it can not only supply the students with authentic reading and audio(-visual) material but gives them also the opportunity to write both in adequate English as meant to be published and interact in everyday speech. But after all, you can do most of the things that moodle offers also via blogs, except for the discussions. And those are better dealt with right in class, where everyone is present – in the end one of the main aims of teaching English is speaking! On-line supplements cannot be a replacement  for real interaction, especially with regards towards pronunciation and intonation, which are essential according to the core curriculum, p.22 (2006).

These were my first reactions after initially learning about and with moodle; I still maintain those arguments speaking against using moodle in the classroom, but as the discussion about moodle goes on and on, I feel that this learning platform deserves some further thoughts.

There are a number of people who speak quite convincingly in favor of using moodle although a real classroom is available.  For instance the project MoodleSchule praises moodle for its convenience in everyday school life, as

  • it offers the students new ways of working in their own responsibility -a trait that will  definitely come in handy after school
  • it gives the teachers new ways of checking and evaluating their student’s improvements, for instance via e-portfolios
  • it enriches communication among the students themselves and between students and teachers

Maybe moodle is that popular because it does not just transfer normal class into an on-line environment, but it is based  on an actual didactical values. Moodle’s creator, Martin Dougiamas, built moodle on four columns (as can be seen on LMSNews.com):

“The classic constructivism (that is, knowledge is constructed and connected by the recipient himself), “constructionism” (which is the conviction that learning is more effective if the content is prepared very well – especially by the teacher, which means that the content is “pre”-constructed), the social constructivism (which means the collaborative and deliberated construction of knowledge reaches a constructive dimension itself) and being “connected” and “separated” (to keep it simple: a symbiosis of collaborative sympathetic part-taking in the learning-process with the separated, objective approach of coherences). Moodle encourages all teachers to keep these concepts in mind and reminds them, that it is not just about “what is taught?” but also “how is it taught?””

This  focus on mainly explorative, active and autonomous learning of course conforms to currently prevailing didactical findings and is very acredited, albeit not revolutionary (Vgl.: Meixner, Johanna: Konstruktivismus und die Vermittlung produktiven Wissens, Luchterhand, 1997.)
There are also great examples available of how to use moodle in literary courses ( you can find the links and access data in our own moodle platform). These examples on “Tortilla Curtain” (anyone remembers Zentralabitur 07?) and “How to kill a Mockingbird” are quite impressive, I think . They offer a wide variety of material and tasks that would be – in my opinion – both challenging and fun to students.

…But still I am not convinced! I have to admit that moodle really has great features and offers lots of opportunities.  What I fail to see, however, is the necessity to make use of these possibilities on-line when teachers should be perfectly able to create the same environment of  communication and self -dependency inside their actual classrooms. In addition to that are the above mentioned examples laid out for many tasks, over a longer period of time (in fact for the whole of the teaching unit), which begs the question when they are supposed to be executed – as homework assignments they are quite extensive, but it would certainly make no sense as well to have the students work on them in class, so that everyone would be interacting on-line instead of face-to-face.

Yet there must be ways to make use of the enormous potential for teaching  that moodle represents. So, where would a virtual classroom come in handy although we have an actual one?

One way to approach and make use of moodle platforms would be for instance in form of projects. This could work much in the same way as a web quest, with the advantage that there could be interaction between the groups via the forum. A moodle project could last maybe for a week, or preferably, accompany the whole teaching unit as a supplement to the classes. In this scenario the students would have each week a certain time at their disposal to work on their project and they would have the option to work additionally on it whenever they like at home.  Should the teacher be absent they could simply continue, assumed that a computer room is available.

Or moodle could be used as a sort of bookshelf – a constant supplement to the respective class – where all relevant material is made available and students could post questions. Although this usage may prevent absent students to constantly ask for extra copies, I feel it would also waste a lot of moodle’s potential.

Another possibility worth exploring could be to use a moodle platform among different learn groups and classes. Especially with regard to the centralized requirements of graduation it could be very useful for all classes of one school – or even co-operations of several schools – to have access to the same materials and tasks, and to be able to discuss these with other students. This way, students can get in touch with new ideas and approaches to the topic that is common to all. It would also enable the students to work on their own with a shared pool of information – so the quality of preparation for the a-levels, for instance, would not dependent on a single teacher.

Advertisement

2 Comments »

  1. Right you are, these a re my considerations as well: an English class is a bunch of people, working & talking together while Moodle aims at a virtual classroom, and yet: useful when a class cannot take place or as part of a project work where learners work autonomously for a (short) time – and perhaps as a sort of digital bookshelf, but without all the communication via Moodle there wouldn’t be a need for it, as a bookshelf can be presented with a blog as well.

  2. Excellent additional considerations and arguments pro & con, Britta, really a smashing piece of work, thanks for that,
    rd


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.